Staying Compliant: What California’s Latest Fair Housing Testing Results Mean for Rental Housing Providers

Fair housing compliance is once again in the spotlight.
The California Civil Rights Department recently released findings from 2024 testing efforts in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. Alarmingly, over half (54%) of the properties tested were found out of compliance with California’s fair housing laws — particularly around source of income discrimination involving Section 8 housing vouchers.

Why These Results Matter for Rental Housing Providers

Although the sample size was limited, the results serve as a crucial reminder:
Fair housing laws are actively enforced, and housing providers must stay vigilant.

Since 2020, California law prohibits discrimination based on a tenant’s use of government assistance programs like Section 8. This means housing providers cannot:

  • Refuse applicants solely because they use housing vouchers.
  • Advertise with terms like “No Section 8.”
  • Apply income requirements without properly adjusting for voucher support.

Rental owners may continue to apply standard screening criteria — such as background checks or rental history — but income standards must only consider the tenant’s portion of the rent, not the full market rent. Additionally, if a voucher-holder lacks traditional credit history, providers must offer alternative ways to document financial responsibility.

Beyond Source of Income: Other Key Compliance Areas

The report also highlighted concerning practices beyond Section 8 discrimination, including:

  • Differential treatment based on race, disability, or familial status.
  • Overly restrictive criminal history policies that could unintentionally have a disparate impact on protected groups.

Blanket bans on applicants with any criminal history — without considering the nature and recency of offenses — are particularly risky under California fair housing standards.

Why Ongoing Education Is Essential

Fair housing laws are complex and evolving. Even well-intentioned housing providers can inadvertently violate regulations without updated policies and regular training.

Best practices include:

  • Conducting annual policy reviews.
  • Providing ongoing fair housing education for property management teams.
  • Updating marketing and tenant screening practices in line with current laws.

Staying informed isn’t just good business — it protects rental investments and minimizes legal risk.

Compliance Is a Continuous Commitment

As fair housing enforcement efforts grow stronger across California, it’s vital for property owners and managers to prioritize compliance.
A strong understanding of the rules around source of income protections, screening policies, and nondiscrimination will help ensure success in an increasingly regulated market.

Looking for reliable property management support that keeps you compliant?
Visit contact us to learn how our expert team can help you protect your investment — and your peace of mind.

Culver City Rejects “Right to Counsel” Ordinance: What It Means for Housing Providers

In a recent decision that has drawn the attention of landlords across California, the Culver City Council voted not to adopt a proposed ordinance that would have provided legal counsel to tenants facing eviction proceedings.

While tenant advocacy groups argued that such a program would offer much-needed legal protections, the City ultimately declined to move forward, citing high costs and uncertain outcomes.

So, what does this decision mean for rental housing providers—and why should investors in Sacramento, Roseville, Concord, Napa, and the East Bay care?

What Was Proposed?

The ordinance aimed to guarantee free legal representation to tenants involved in landlord-tenant disputes, particularly evictions. Similar “right to counsel” measures have already been implemented in cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Oakland.

To fund the program, the proposal considered placing additional fees on rental property owners—a concern that drew strong pushback from the housing community.

Why Was the Ordinance Rejected?

After considerable public debate, the Culver City Council ultimately rejected the proposal due to the following key concerns:

1. Cost to Taxpayers and Landlords

The estimated cost exceeded $1 million annually. Council members questioned whether this expense could be justified, especially given the city’s other budgetary obligations.

2. Lack of Clear Outcomes

Data from similar programs elsewhere show mixed results. Legal representation does not always prevent eviction, and in many cases, tenants leave voluntarily or through mediated settlements.

3. Unfair Burden on Housing Providers

Many local landlords, especially small property owners, argued that they shouldn’t be required to subsidize legal services that may delay or complicate the already lengthy eviction process.

What This Means for Other California Cities

Although the ordinance was rejected in Culver City, this issue is far from settled. Other cities across California are exploring similar measures, and local governments may continue to propose tenant legal aid programs—often funded through rental housing fees.

If you own property in regions like Sacramento, Concord, or Napa, it’s critical to stay informed. Changes at the city level can have a real impact on how you manage your rental business.

Stay Informed and Protected

At Real Property Management Select, we keep our clients informed about regulatory changes that affect the rental housing market. From rent control ordinances to legal aid proposals, we monitor city council decisions and help property owners navigate California’s evolving legal landscape.

Partner with a team that’s always ahead of the curve. Let us handle the legislation, compliance, and tenant management—so you can focus on the returns.

📩 Have questions about how local policies may affect your rental property?
Contact our team today for a personalized consultation.

Avoiding Bad Tenants: The Screening Process That Works

When it comes to protecting your rental property investment, few decisions are as critical as choosing the right tenants. In cities like Sacramento, Concord, and the broader East Bay region, where rental demand remains strong, it’s tempting to fill vacancies quickly—but the wrong tenant can lead to costly repairs, lost income, and legal headaches.

At Real Property Management Select, we help homeowners screen tenants with precision and compliance. This blog outlines a proven screening process designed to minimize risk and help landlords avoid common—and expensive—mistakes.

Why Thorough Tenant Screening is Essential

Whether you own a single-family rental in Roseville or a multifamily unit in Napa, your tenants have a direct impact on your bottom line. A thorough screening process helps you:

  • Avoid rent defaults and late payments 
  • Minimize property damage from careless or irresponsible tenants 
  • Prevent legal conflicts related to evictions and lease violations 
  • Increase tenant retention, reducing turnover costs 
  • Protect your property’s long-term value 

In California, where landlord-tenant laws are complex, especially in rent-controlled areas, proactive screening isn’t just good practice—it’s a necessity.

A Proven Tenant Screening Process That Delivers Results

1. Pre-Screening to Save Time and Filter Fast

Before scheduling a showing, we recommend asking applicants a few qualifying questions:

  • Do you meet the income requirement (usually 2.5–3x rent)? 
  • What is your expected move-in date? 
  • Do you have any pets? 
  • Have you ever been evicted or convicted of a felony? 

These early filters help you identify serious applicants while avoiding wasted time.

2. Complete Rental Application

A legally compliant rental application should include:

  • Employment and income history 
  • Previous landlords and rental addresses 
  • Social Security Number or Tax ID for verification 
  • Signed consent for background and credit checks 

We recommend requiring all adult occupants (18+) to complete the application.

3. Credit Check: Understanding Financial Responsibility

A credit report offers insights into how a tenant handles their financial obligations. Key factors:

  • Credit score (we look for 650+ from Equifax) 
  • History of on-time payments 
  • Debt-to-income ratio 
  • Presence of collections, liens, or bankruptcy 
4. Criminal & Eviction Background Check

This step protects your property, neighbors, and community. Red flags may include:

  • Prior evictions 
  • Criminal convictions related to violence, drugs, or property damage 
  • Identity fraud or false information on the application 

Always follow fair housing guidelines and consider the context of any criminal record.

5. Income Verification

Stable income is a key indicator of a reliable tenant. Acceptable proof includes:

  • Recent pay stubs (2–3 months) 
  • Tax returns (for self-employed applicants) 
  • Employment offer letters 
  • Bank statements  

Aim for at least 2.5 to 3 times the rent in monthly gross income.

6. Landlord References

Call at least two previous landlords and ask:

  • Did they pay rent on time? 
  • Were there any complaints or lease violations? 
  • Did they maintain the property well? 
  • Would you rent to them again? 

Beware of fake references—verify contact info independently when possible.

7. Consistent Criteria = Legal Protection

In regions like Concord or Sacramento, where rent control and tenant protections are evolving, consistency is key. Apply your screening criteria uniformly to all applicants to remain compliant with California’s Fair Housing laws.

Common Tenant Red Flags to Avoid

While no screening method is 100% foolproof, here are red flags that deserve a closer look:

  • Incomplete applications or reluctance to share information 
  • Gaps in rental or employment history 
  • History of evictions or ongoing disputes 
  • Aggressive or evasive communication 
  • Income that barely meets the minimum requirement 

If something feels off, it’s okay to take your time or request additional documentation.

Why Work with Real Property Management Select?

Tenant screening can be time-consuming—and mistakes can be costly. We specialize in protecting property owners in Sacramento, Roseville, Concord, Napa, and throughout the East Bay with a compliant, efficient, and detailed tenant placement process.

Here’s what sets us apart:

  • Legal compliance with local and state regulations 
  • Access to nationwide screening databases 
  • Structured lease agreements and documentation 
  • In-house expertise in eviction protection and risk reduction 

Avoiding bad tenants starts with a great screening process. By applying consistent, thorough, and legally sound screening methods, you can reduce vacancy stress, lower turnover costs, and enjoy a smoother property ownership experience.

Ready to Find Better Tenants?

Let Real Property Management Select handle the hard work of screening, placement, and lease enforcement—so you can focus on what matters most.

📞 Talk to our property experts today

Why the East Bay and Surrounding Areas Are Smart Choices for Rental Property Investment

With the cost of living in California continuing to rise, strategic investors are looking beyond the saturated core of San Francisco—and finding serious opportunities in the East Bay and surrounding regions. Cities like Concord, Napa, Roseville, and Sacramento are quickly becoming some of the most attractive rental property markets in Northern California.

Whether you’re a first-time buyer or expanding a portfolio, here’s why now is a great time to consider these key investment areas.

1. Concord and the East Bay: Strong Rent Demand & Improved Regulation

The East Bay has always benefited from proximity to San Francisco, but more than that—it now offers a standalone economic and residential appeal. Concord, in particular, is seeing renewed attention after recent updates to its rent control ordinance. While still protective of tenants, the revised version introduces predictability for landlords, including:

  • A fixed 5% annual rent cap (instead of the former 3% CPI-based cap).
  • Just Cause exemptions for small landlords with limited properties.

This more balanced approach creates a more stable investment environment—especially when paired with Concord’s low vacancy rates and steady population growth.

 

2. Napa: High-Value Market with Long-Term Growth

Known for its luxury tourism, Napa also offers an appealing rental market with relatively limited housing supply. Professionals in the hospitality, medical, and education sectors continue to fuel rental demand. Investors can benefit from:

  • High rental rates driven by limited inventory
  • A growing population of long-term renters
  • Stable property appreciation

While the upfront investment in Napa may be higher than in other areas, the quality of tenants and property value retention make it a top-tier long-term play.

 

3. Roseville: A Suburban Market That’s Thriving

Just outside of Sacramento, Roseville has rapidly transformed from a quiet suburb into a booming residential hub. It ranks high for:

  • New development (both residential and commercial)
  • Excellent public schools
  • Business-friendly policies

The combination of lower housing costs compared to the Bay Area and high livability makes Roseville attractive to families—and to investors seeking stable, long-term tenants.

 

4. Sacramento: California’s Capital of Rental Stability

Sacramento continues to be one of the most consistent rental markets in Northern California. With more people priced out of the Bay Area, the city has become a refuge for those seeking affordability, jobs, and quality of life.

Here’s why Sacramento works for investors:

  • Growing job market in healthcare, tech, and government
  • Solid rent growth, even through economic fluctuations
  • Diverse property types (multifamily, single-family, new construction)

With ongoing urban development and strong rental occupancy rates, Sacramento is often considered a cornerstone market for serious California investors.

 

5. Why These Regions Work Together

What connects these regions—Concord, Napa, Roseville, and Sacramento—is their ability to attract long-term tenants and offer lower competition for investors compared to coastal hubs.

Additionally, the surrounding infrastructure and regional economies continue to fuel demand:

  • Proximity to major freeways and transit corridors
  • Access to outdoor lifestyle and suburban comforts
  • A growing pool of renters priced out of SF, Oakland, and San Jose

Whether you’re targeting high-return luxury rentals in Napa or seeking stable cash flow properties in Sacramento or Roseville, the East Bay and surrounding areas are worth your consideration.

At Real Property Management Select, we help investors navigate local regulations, screen quality tenants, and maximize returns in all the markets we serve.

Ready to explore investment opportunities in Concord, Napa, Roseville, or Sacramento?
Let’s talk about your goals → Contact our team today.